Will the state shut down education and training institutions?

In the updated wave on August 11, 2021, as far as the current situation is concerned, the policy is really to choke all discipline training institutions, regardless of whether the practitioners live or live, and the implementation is very firm. The previous opinions and predictions were too optimistic, and they were slapped in the face Recently, the reform of educational institutions is in full swing, and there are many issues that are of interest to everyone. Such as

• 1. Will the state shut down education and training institutions?
• 2. Where are the chaos in the education and training industry?
• 3. Where is the starting point of the state’s rectification of education and training institutions? Will it work?
• 4. Will the school cancel winter and summer vacations? Is school hosting reliable? Will it affect the organization? Is it serious?
• 4. What’s wrong with education in our country? How to solve it.
• Let us analyze it systematically from different angles to find the answer.
• 1. Will the state shut down education and training institutions?

The answer is no.

We need to see what the purpose of the country’s rectification is. At present, the most credible thing is to crack down on industry leaders and restrict or even prevent capital from entering the education industry.

Many Zhihu answers in this part are very clear. That is the answer to question 2, where is the chaos in the education and training industry: capital enters institutions by spending money on publicity, recruiting teachers and management personnel, and draining publicity, like parents asking for high-class fees, lowering the salary of teachers, and profiting from it. This is what capital and large institutions are good at. Make cakes, make big cakes, cash out, and evacuate. As for what is in this case, the capital will not care about who eats it. It is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

This part is something that almost everyone except capitalists is happy to see, including parents, institutional teachers, and people who eat melons.

Judging from the current information, this direction is almost certain. Large institutions backed by capital will suffer a certain degree of the blow. We will wait and see how serious it is.

And small and medium-sized institutions will be affected a bit, but not too much. The small and medium-sized institutions here refer to flat-managed institutions, that is, a principal (or school committee) with a group of teachers at the front desk. Such organizations rarely have false propaganda, vicious competition, and sales anxiety that cause incorrect public opinion orientation. There is no evil done by large organizations, and there is no such thing as punishment. The funding of the school is clear, the cost of running the school, teacher salaries and income. Can’t make a lot of money, but solve a lot of employment, and also provide corresponding services for nearby parents. Decision-makers should not eliminate these beneficial insects. These institutions dare not publicize with much fanfare. If the understanding of the parents of students changes, the source of students of small institutions will be affected a little.

Small institutions will basically be destroyed. If there are no formal procedures, and the safety management is not standardized, it will be killed by various inspections and rectification notices. The local education bureau only needs to give each school a notification. If a certain institution is unqualified, you don’t have to do it.
3. Why does the country want to rectify the education and training industry?

Two aspects, on the one hand, are the aforementioned chaos in the industry: Institutional teachers are mixed, and capital takes the opportunity to commit evil.

On the other hand, it is necessary to reduce the burden on the family and encourage childbirth.

Will it be effective? For the first point, there should be some results. The second point will not have any effect.

Quite simply, the burden of the family is not brought about by education and training institutions.

Education and training institutions were born in response to the need for “volumes,” but not because of the volume.

This brings us to the fourth question, what is wrong with education. Volume, how did it come from? Let us follow the logic.

Why do we roll? Because Chinese education actually divides people into classes, roughly equivalent to social class, we must strive to reach a higher class.

Is the purpose of education to stratify people? No, the purpose of education is to make natural people better become social people.

For example, the three children of ABC:

A has good academic performance but is introverted and not good at communicating with others, and has poor self-care ability;

B has poor grades but great physical fitness. He is a basketball expert;

Classmate C is also very poor in the study but can take care of himself very well and sing very well.

How should we treat these three different children? The answer is very simple. Everyone can say a few words. Let A go to high school and go to university for a doctoral degree in scientific research; let B practice sports and become an athlete; let C learn to sing and become a singer. But how do we do it in reality?

Let the three students complete 9 years of compulsory education together, went to high school together, entered different universities based on the results of an exam, and found a job that can make ends meet after graduation. Really, that’s how we did it.

Why do you do this?

First, it is difficult to live decently in this country by relying on sports and singing skills.

Second, our education simply does not have the ability to support you to develop your stylistic and sports skills, or even to allow you to enter scientific research institutions efficiently.

The result is obvious. Why did we do it? First, the job opportunities provided by society are limited, or decent work is limited. Second, school education is a serious one-size-fits-all. These two problems are basically unsolvable, and they have been unsolvable for nearly half a century.

We do not have enough good companies to work for young people. The country not only does not give companies enough soil and air to grow but instead sets up a card to levy heavy taxes along the way. The state has not taken out precise and practical measures to protect the interests of workers, but only implements the income of civil servants, the establishment of the enterprise and the state-owned enterprises, national holidays, and weekends. However, the number of jobs provided by these units is only a fraction of the population in need of employment. The vast majority of employment can only be in private companies. They work year-round with meager wages. Watching a civil servant complain about the disadvantages of bringing children to work. Can’t play games freely, is this world quite magical? This is how the ruling class started eating meat. And no one listens to your complaints. People take the exams for civil servants themselves, so you don’t have the skills. Who do you rely on? So how big the gap between the rich and the poor is, and how big the difference in status between labor and labor is, there will be more books in education.